I would have to say Understanding Comics was an interesting read and that McCloud
brought up some interesting points. But I think he spent too much time trying
to create a definition for what a comic is. It became to complicated and for
myself a bit confusing. It made me feel like I lost some important point to the
defining process. To me comics have always been in a very simple definition of,
a series of image put to a page to tell a story. Now McCloud goes through word after word and
complicates it a bit too much. But that’s the only time he really lost me.
Now his discussion
on how we perceive faces and why we are more willing to see ourselves in a
cartoon environment than one that is completely realistic, was interesting.
Especially in that we see ourselves more in the characters drawn simply; than
the one drawn realistically. But to me that is still just the surface. He discussed a bit on content and writing but
not much. Which in some ways disappointed me because sometimes our identity
that gets tied to characters isn’t by just how they look its by how they act
and how they are written. Content also plays a big role because you have to be
interested in the content before you even can feel an identity to a
character. So by solely going about it
in an image based sense excludes some of comic books other aspects.
But I think he was
just trying to keep it simple for the viewer. His break down on how stories
progress and our filling in information that isn’t there with panels was very interesting.
And the variety of the basic panels gave a good look at to what you find in
most western comics, I would say. He did delve into the eastern but mostly on
Japan. And how their pace in story telling was much different. I do agree to
this view, western culture is mostly go, go, go! While eastern holds onto
moments so you can see what they mean or to actually enjoy the moment. This
does create an interesting comparison and gives another view into how to pace a
story.
But (yes just one
more but) overall I felt a bit restricted in McCloud’s views, he gave a very
systematic view on comics. Which is fine if you’re a person who hasn’t read a
lot of comics or maybe needs a clearer understanding. But it felt to cold to me
at times, that I was restricted to a view that sometimes would open up. His
points were clear and not false, but I didn’t feel excitement while reading it.
This may be that I read Will Eisner’s Sequential
Art and for me that one was really
about movement and actor, action, stage so in a way it felt like a play. So
maybe I should cut some slack with McCloud, he in the end was in a search for a
better definition or comics.